Now, you should know that it is not possible to checkmate a lone king of the opponent with any random chess piece combination. For example, you are not able to checkmate with a single knight and a king against a lone king.
But, with just a queen and a king against a lone king you can easily checkmate provided you know the basic checkmating procedures. So this also highlights the power of the queen in chess. Now having talked so much about the power of the queen, a genuine doubt may come to our mind that why the king though the most valuable chess piece is far less powerful than the queen. The queen has the maximum mobility on the chessboard.
Although the king is the most valuable chess piece, its mobility is limited. So in that sense, the queen is more powerful than the king in chess.
Read this article to know more. When a king is checkmated, you lose the game. And no one wants to lose a chess game, right? So considering that, its value is infinite. A king can move in all directions but only up to one square except castling in which the king moves two squares. Whereas a queen can move in all directions up to any number of squares. So, from this point only, you can imagine the mobility and freedom of a queen on the chessboard.
As per Wikipedia, chess originated in India around the 7th century AD. After that, it went to Persia and after that to Arab and finally reached Europe. Names of many chess pieces were changed, piece movement was also changed. Also, new chess rules like castling and en passant were introduced.
The piece that we now call as queen, was previously known as a Wazir Mantri which means advisor of a king and was allowed to move only one square diagonally. It gained the combined power of both the rook and bishop. According to many chess historians like Murray H. In her introduction, she asks:. What is her relationship to the other chessmen? What can she tell us about the civilization that created her? Reading on, one learns three fascinating parts of the answer. But second, the early queen was far from the icon of power she is today.
Yalom relates this to the importance of a series of strong European queens during the ensuring centuries. So the queen was born of the gender politics associated with the clash between Christianity and Eastern cultures; and gained power in concert with traditions of queenly rule in Europe. This is the most important thing you can learn from chess. Also, positivity brah is the most important thing you can learn in life. The time when chess was popular many kings did not go battle, but stayed where in the castle , however i have an argument here, where the queen in actuality is the general for the play a similiar role.
In the dark ages the general was usally the best tactican and best fighter which the queen is in chess is. Food for thought i may be just rambling. In the past I don't think it was a queen or female and it couldn't move nearly as far only 2 squares in any direction I think? I'm not chess historian, so this is just a rough sketch lol. When it moved to Europe the names of pieces changed and certain rules were added to help speed the game up. Among these were pawns able to move two squares forward, en passant, castling, and increased range of the queen piece whatever it was called at the time.
Also you could say it's for practical purposes that the king is not the most mobile piece. Imagine trying to checkmate a piece that can hop like a knight and move like a queen.
In fact, when it comes to game play the icons aren't meant to tell a story. The movements and rules simply create a game rich in strategy and tactics. The rook's solid brick walls and bishop's piety are frivolous historical relics or pure imagination unrelated to the game itself. Similarly it's unnecessary to try to explain castling or promotion. I wouldn't quite characterize the game as pro-proletariat.
Queen Isabella etc etc if you search history. It's simply europeans dont had any concept of advisor. Marilyn Yalom, The Birth of the Chess Queen describes the several century process from the entrance of the queen in place of the vizier noted by wafflemaster and the queen becoming the most powerful piece during the reign of Queen Isabella of Spain.
It is not true that Kings were never harmed nor even killed in combat. Anyway according to the origins of chess, BatGirl's article that is the main reason chess was invented, so the King could learn humility. Check her article out. You don't have to take my word for it, lol. I am not going to argue with the historical reasonings for why the queen came to be called a queen - but I like the way how we've all accepted the idea that the queen is always the second in power and the weaker sex.
0コメント