Who is mcluhan

He was learning in spite of his professors , but he would become a professor of English in spite of himself. Looking back on both his own Cambridge years and the longer history of the institution, he reflected that a principal aim of the faculty could be summarized as the training of perception , a phrase that aptly summarizes his own aim throughout his career.

The shock that McLuhan experienced in his first teaching post propelled him toward media analysis. Though his students at the University of Wisconsin were his juniors by only five to eight years, he felt removed from them by a generation. He suspected that this had to do with ways of learning and set out to investigate it. The holiday, which is a big deal elsewhere, is becoming a thing here, too. If you're in the market for a new option this cold-weather season, we've rounded up four fashionable finds that will be sure to up your cool factor, while keeping out the cold.

Sign up to receive the daily top stories from the National Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of NP Posted will soon be in your inbox. We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again. This website uses cookies to personalize your content including ads , and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here.

By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Sign up. At heart, McLuhan was not a futurist at all but a critic and an academic rebel in the tradition of Henry Adams, another conservative Christian mystic who preferred analyzing large-scale trends to compiling sober catalogs of unenlightening facts.

On the other hand, McLuhan was not a Luddite. In place of moralistic hand-wringing, McLuhan urged his listeners to take a stance of awareness and responsibility. Marshall McLuhan was a skeptic, a joker, and an erudite maniac. He read too deeply from Finnegans Wake, had too great a fondness for puns, and never allowed his fun to be ruined by the adoption of a coherent point of view. He was dismayed by any attempt to pin him down to a consistent analysis and dismissive of criticism that his plans were impractical or absurd.

His characteristic comment during one academic debate has taken on a mythic life of its own. In response to a renowned American sociologist, McLuhan countered: "You don't like those ideas?

I got others. In a letter to Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, with whom he had a long friendship, McLuhan argued that in the modern electronic environment, it is inadvisable to be coherent. As he explained to Trudeau: "I have yet to find a situation in which there is not great help in the phrase: 'You think my fallacy is all wrong? It can be said with a certain amount of poignancy and mock deliberation. McLuhan's idea that media are extensions of man was influenced by the work of the Catholic philosopher Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, who believed that the use of electricity extends the central nervous system.

McLuhan's mysticism sometimes led him to hope, as had Teilhard, that electronic civilization would prove a spiritual leap forward and put humankind in closer contact with God.

But McLuhan did not hold on to this brief hope, and he later decided that the electronic unification of humanity was only a facsimile of the mystical body.

As an unholy imposter, the electronic universe was "a blatant manifestation of the Anti-Christ. Though he enjoyed observing the battles of the day as they were played out in the media, McLuhan was deeply attached to the church and suspicious enough of worldly goings-on to be immune to large-scale politics or reformation movements. He put his faith in Christ. When challenged by a British journalist about the deleterious effects of electronic culture, McLuhan responded that he had "no doubt at all that Christus vincit.

That is why a Christian cannot but be amused at the antics of worldlings to 'put us on. Pragmatic and tentative hardly seem the right adjectives for one of our era's greatest provocateurs. But in light of his Catholicism, McLuhan's pragmatism makes sense. Mystics are attuned to the voice of the Holy Spirit coming in directly, and they are the great demolishers of doctrine. Pragmatic does not mean practical, but nonsystematic. Tentative does not mean weak, but provisional and willing to change course under the influence of new revelations.

McLuhan did not want to live in the global village. The prospect frightened him. Print culture had produced rational man, in whom vision was the dominant sense.

Print man lived in a world that was secular rather than sacred, specialized rather than holistic. But when information travels at electronic speeds, the linear clarity of the print age is replaced by a feeling of "all-at-onceness. There is no clear order or sequence. This sudden collapse of space into a single unified field "dethrones the visual sense. For McLuhan, this future held a profound risk of mass terror and sudden panic. The current idea of a global village as a place of universal harmony and industrious basket-weaving is a tourist's fantasy.

McLuhan gave in to the intoxication of this hope for a few years in the early '60s, and it is evident throughout Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, his most optimistic work. In that book, McLuhan sings of the furthest reaches of electronic culture, when computer technology has replaced language with instant nonverbal communication.

He compares this mystical unification of humanity to the Christian Pentecost. But McLuhan soon realized that before the Pentecost comes suffering and crucifixion, and while we are all waiting for the Holy Ghost to descend, Jerusalem is likely to be scary as hell. When McLuhan said that the medium is the message, he was trying to raise an alarm. Big debates over the content of media — such as the controversies over sex and violence on television — miss the point entirely, he argued, because the transformation of human life is carried on by the form of the medium rather than any specific program transmitted by it.

Protesting the programs carried by the media is futile because the owners of the media are always happy to give the public exactly what it wants. Standing in opposition to any sort of programming is not only a lonely and isolating posture, it also serves to advance the popularity of the programming protested. Of course the content of a medium is important, but according to McLuhan the content is not the programming.

This sort of content, McLuhan wrote, "is like the juicy piece of meat carried by the burglar to distract the watchdog of the mind.

We are the content of our media. Each medium delivers a new form of human being, whose qualities are suited to it. Language is a type of technology, too, McLuhan noted, anticipating and rejecting the moralism of modern-day Luddites.

He and Corrine also started a family at that time. Michael's College. An encounter with the work of Harold Innis in the s, along with the development of television, helped cement ideas that had been "in progress" since McLuhan's days at Cambridge. Footnote 1 Leavis and Richards' ideas about the effects of language's forms connected with Innis's argument that communication technologies created specific kinds of biases.

The group was interdisciplinary in nature, with participants drawn from art, economics, anthropology, urban studies and psychology. Footnote 2. McLuhan published his first major work during this period. The Mechanical Bride was an examination of the impact of advertising on society and culture.